Tulsi Gabbard met with bipartisan doubts in confirmation hearing

Former Congress former Congress Barous Gabbard created a ruckus on Thursday with a detailed smile in the hearing room of the Senate Intelligence Committee, as some members of the audience gave him a permanent ovation while chanting “USA, USA, USA”. .

This was a brief moment of extreme excitement for Gabard otherwise stressful and politically frightening confirmation hearing, which was tamened by President Donald Trump to be the director of national intelligence. His nomination has been found with suspicion on both sides of the corridor due to lack of his experience and suspicious contact.

They have been criticized for spying the dandruff talks and Syrian President Basha al-Assad for doubting the use of chemical weapons against their people. His long-standing relationship for Chris Butler and his aerial-based science identification is a vague sect of Hare Krishna, which has been described by former members as a creed, has also come under investigation.

Gabard experience in air politics, where at the age of 21 she became the youngest state MLA in the state and eventually went to run for the President, there was only one footnote at the Thursday hearing. Former Congressmen have extended everyone ahead of the islands in the development from Democratic Mavric to Trump’s loyalty.

In his initial statement, Gabard swipe back to his opponents, stating that he is a victim of smear and lies. He tried to assure the committee that he did not have to see anyone – not Trump, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is close, or a spiritual guru.

“Those who oppose my nomination means that I am loyal to something or someone else, apart from God, my own conscience and the Constitution of the United States,” Gabbard said. “The fact is that really harasses my political opponents, I deny their puppets.”

Gabbard has spent the weeks to convince the senators that it is the right person to oversee the country’s intelligence system, including 18 agencies, and to give the President a daily briefing about possible threats in the world . Some supporters on political rights say that it will help shake the status quo, but it is associated with questions about whether he has resumed and has the necessary experience for a significant situation.

Gabbard is a former Democrat, who first tied up with the left side of the party. Since he switched to the parties and gravated for Trump, he was forced to face some of his previous policy positions and public statements, some of which came out during Thursday hearing.

Recently, the identification of Gabbard was investigated with the Foundation in The Wall Street Journal and New York Times stories, but no senator asked directly about his beliefs. Former followers of the sect have reached MPs, who have reached with concerns about Gabbard’s relationship with the Foundation and its leader Butler, who have a history of spying of extreme LBTQ and Islamophobic ideals.

Gabard Democrats attacked in his initial statementSaying that questions about their spirituality explains that they are “using religious fundamentalism once again.”

Senators of both parties pressed Gabbard on former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who leaked classified documents about global monitoring efforts. Some senators demanded that she calls her a traitor, which she refused to repeatedly.

Gabard, a vocal supporter of Snowden, first described him as a brave whistleblower, which should be forgiven.

In an exchange, Marine Corps Intelligence Officer, Republican Sen Tod Young asked Gabbard if he agreed to the report of a house intelligence committee, which found Snowden’s leaked “”American national security loss,

When Gabbard dodged, by repeating a line he used Snowden often about breaking the law, Young assessed his reply. “It is notable that you said yes,” he said.

Gabard’s enrollment rests on the slim margin and will require each Republican of the Intelligence Committee to vote in favor of sending his confirmation on the floor of the full Senate. Already, Sen Susan Colins, a Republican of Maine who sit on the intelligence committee, Expressed apprehension About enrollment.

During the hearing, Gabbard inquired about one of his most controversial decisions, even questioned about the 2017 trip to Syria, where he met with Assad.

American Sen Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona, revealed the suspicion of Gabbard about the use of chemical weapons asad on his own people. He said that in favor of our own principles, we predict their prediction to dismiss intelligence, some of which were based on loose evidences. From suspicious sourcesSpeakers for lack of decisions.

“I think this is something that we all should be worried about,” he said.

Nevertheless, Gabbard defended his decision to meet with Assad. Another senator was directly asked if he felt that the journey was a good idea, he said that it was.

“I believe that the leader, whether you are in Congress or the President of the United States, going and attractive, shoes on the ground, learning and listening to people and directly with people, whether they meet opponents or friends,” Can benefit greatly, “he said.