Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Protecting the detective agencies and line up behind Hawkish unanimous, the director of the Rampant Islamophobia of the bipartisan aristocrats National Intelligence Nominee was ignored.
The presidential candidates have been top-uttering with data described as Donald Trump’s slate “controversial” and “polarization”-but which can be more accurately described as audience and misfits: Matt Gates, Pete Hegseth, Robert F. Kennedy Junior, Kash Patel, and Tulsi Gabbard. This group is allegedly various accused statutory rape (Gates), rape (Hegseth), Antivax Politics and sexual harassment (Kennedy), and Ruling aspirations (Patel). GAETZ has been only one of these controversial nominees, forced to withdraw. Hegseth won a narrow confirmation. But even in this list of audball along with distorted personal history and ruling goals, Tulsi Gabbard -Tram’s nominee to be the director of National Intelligence (DNI) – tells if he makes him strange that his wild There are ideological changes.
Former aerial governor Neil Ebercrombi, who is a disillusionment former supporter, has described Gabard as a “shapeshifter”. Abbercrombi was quoted in a democrat new York Times profile It documented the wild dance of Gabard in the political spectrum. She was born in the science of the identity sect described by New York Times As “a secret offshoot of the Hare Krishna movement opposes the same-linga relationships and abortion, and there is deep doubt on Islam.” Although she now says that she is not associated with the science of the Identity Foundation and simply recognizes it as a Hindu, this movement has played an important role in supporting her throughout her career. In particular, when she was first selected for Hawaii Statehouse in 2002, she shared the science of identity for abortion and marriage equality. Later, while running for the Congress as a Democrat, he rejected those positions, although he has Keep stable in your IslamophobiaOne of some relevant commitments in his unstable political career.
In 2003, she got involved in nationalist enthusiasm for the war of George W. Bush over terror and joined the army. But given the massacre in Iraq, it calls “the change of governance ‘war”. In 2010, he was elected to the Congress, he had a biography profile – military veteran, a woman, a racial minority, and mildly ignorant of the conservative on social issues – which made him attractive to establish the party. She was designed as an emerging star, but in 2016, supporting Berney Sanders for the President, burnt his bridges with installation. When Trump won in 2016, he was actively placed by the Maga leaders such as Steve Banon, who saw his dissatisfaction with the mainstream democrats. One indication is that she can be a possible recruitment. In 2016, she met with the winning candidate at Trump Towers, when she was a presidential election.
Gabbard mixture of foreign policy preferences – a deep disturbance conversion wars and efforts to build democracy, unwavering support for Israel, desire to deepen America’s relations for Hindu nationalism in India – Trump and Bannon’s first foreign foreign Aligned with the policy.
Like the Maga movement, Gabbard is zenophobic, but is alsoware of military interventions related to shoes on the ground. This heterodox foreign policy mixture spoke about the US’s support for Ukraine before and after Russia’s invasion – and to praise Edward Snowden, who leaked a treasure of the mysteries of the National Security Agency in 2013 , In the form of a whistleblower who deserves an forgiveness. These are the main sources of the national security elite for Gabbard. In form of Times Notes, “Their nominations have worried the national security officers of both sides, and Mr. Trump has personally told colleagues that their cabinet confirmed that he is most concerned.”
Looking at Gabbard checker political career, the reason for people in the political spectrum is to oppose their nominations from traditional orthodox Republicans to liberals. A base of his support can be the Maga ideology that cares about foreign policy – not only former Fox News Host Tucker Carlson. But it is not clear whether this faction dominated the Republican in the Senate to successfully protect the foreign policy from the aristocratic classes.
Current issue
In the nomination hearing held on Thursday, Senate Democrats took a step – clearly clever but disappointment in the context of policy – Gabbard’s foreign policy to play heterodoxy, especially their prior defense of Snowden, which he only partially forms Missed from In terms of the dynamics of the Senate, this step is understood. Republican holds a majority of 53 Senate seats. To defeat Trump’s candidate, Democrats need to flip four Republicans, otherwise the GOP will have 50 votes as a tie breaker as a tie breaker.
Mathematical argument means that to defeat Gabbard, Democrats needed to make a pitch appealing to Republican. But beyond mathematics, there is a broad political fact that in response to Trumpism, establishment Democrats prefer to build a centralist alliance except national security consent. The leaders of the Democratic Party are deeply placed for the policy of restoration of the anion regim As a synergy with Russia and the ability of intelligence information questions.
In the past, Gabbard is Appreciated Snowden in the form of a “brave” whistlebloor who was entitled to apologetic. She has now retreated by saying that she “broke the law” and she would not be the head of DNI support Clamency. Both Republican and Democrats worked hard on the issue with Colorado Democrat Michael Bennett Thundering, “This is when you need to answer the questions of those whose votes you have confirmed as the chief intelligence officer of this nation Are asking to do Is Edward Snowden a traitor to the United States? This is not a difficult question to answer when bets are high. ,
Gabbard still refused to describe Snowden as a traitor – which Democrat seized it as a means of defaming him. On X, East Twitter, Bennett Posted“Tulsi Gabard, four times, was asked whether Edward Snowden is a traitor to release American mysteries and four times he refused to respond to Democrats or Republicans. Anyone who refuses to label a traitor in the US as a traitor is completely ineligible to lead our intelligence community. ,
Whatever the Bennett refused to consider was likely that, away from being a traitor, Snowden was a patriotic speech that did a great service to the public by revealing the abuse of the real government – some of which some later by the Congress by the Congress Was prevented.
The committee’s Bennett and other Democrats were playing their old game of running for Republican rights over foreign policy. Although it can be seen as smart politics in the Centrist Circle – and can submerge Gabard’s enrollment well – it is suspected if the public has shared this inherent enthusiasm for the national security establishment and intelligence agencies. Trump won the presidential twice Anti-system voice of angerBoth with intelligence services between national security consent and their major goals. Conversely, Democrats have lost twice to Trump, causing him to criticize foreign policy as a disruptive force, embracing such stallwarts of militants as a Henry Kisser (Promotion By Hillary Clinton in 2016) and Dick Chenny (Celebrated By Kamala Harris in 2024). This strategy of being a Hawkish Pro-System Party has separated the Democratic Party and has separated the major parts of the party’s Aadhaar.
popular
“Swipe below to see more authors”Swipe →
What is about the entire spectacle is that there are many valid reasons to challenge Gabbard’s nomination – but the Senate is interested in raising these questions. As journalist Mehdi Hasan noted“Sadly, Democrats – Support to Gabbard for his Islamophobia and support for massacre in Gaza and support for Assad and support for his perceived membership of a strange cult – paying attention to one thing about one thing Are: Edward Snowden. “
If Gabbard is defeated, there will be very few reasons for regrets. He is entitled to go down, but is being targeted for wrong reasons. The true tragedy is that the Democratic Party Elite is committed to keeping foreign debate as narrow as possible, eagerly as a bodyguard out of the touch out of touch and to discredit the national security establishment.
More than jeet heer 
The unexpectedly powerful farewell address of the former President condemned a very elite class.
Biden’s domestic agenda was the most progressive of any president since Lindon Johnson. But it was associated with a foreign policy that drowned his legacy in blood.
,
Jeeva
When voters are consumed with anti-system anger, a criminal rap sheet is not an obstacle to the high office.
